Re: Portugal portuguese manual files
- From: Tiago Santos <tiagofsantos81 sapo pt>
- To: Rafael Fontenelle <rafaelff gnome org>
- Cc: Duarte Loreto <happyguy_pt hotmail com>, GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Portugal portuguese manual files
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 21:00:28 +0100
Looks good.
https://build.gnome.org/#/build/20160902.50
Have a nice weekend.
Best regards,
Tiago Santos
Às 20:57 de 02-09-2016, Tiago Santos escreveu:
Ok. I reviewed carefully the baobab file (the smaller one) and
resubmitted it via DamnedLies.
Most of the work was revising machine translations that had slipped
through. All tags checked ("<_:média-1/>" also checked), but I will be
keeping an eye on build.gnome.org on the next hours to see if there
are any issues.
If all is good, in a few days I will do the same for the other files,
this time taking proper time to thoroughly review each manual.
Às 03:00 de 02-09-2016, Rafael Fontenelle escreveu:
So, the commit I made for the Portuguese translation for help files
presented 2 issues: unexpected newline in Makefile.am (I believe that
happened only in gnome-terminal) and PO files with some bogus content
that end up breaking build for gnome-terminal (gnome-3-20 and
master), gnome-calculator (master) and baobab (master). All the bogus
PO files disabled now.
I verified with Gettext's msgfmt and PyG3T's gtxml before commiting
(but didn't test building) and, after the whole problem, I made some
content analysis of the problematic PO files and found nothing. I
even fixed some XML tags like "<_:média-1/>" (p.s. do not translate
these xml tags in GNOME help files!), but it didn't changed the
outcome. I sincerely don't have a solution and, sadly, don't have the
time to look throughout the whole PO file to figure out what is wrong
on it. Sorry, Tiago.
2016-09-01 13:48 GMT-03:00 Tiago Santos <tiagofsantos81 sapo pt
<mailto:tiagofsantos81 sapo pt>>:
On DamnedLies you can see that gnome-terminal was not inicially
commited to master where I uploaded it but on 3.20.
https://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-terminal/gnome-3-20/help/pt
<https://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-terminal/gnome-3-20/help/pt>
Could that be the culprint?
No, I cherry-picked from gnome-3-20 to master branch. Both branches
were 100% translated, until the commit was reverted to resolve the
breakage. The problem here is (was) tin he PO file that had something
bogus.
Regards,
Rafael Fontenelle
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]