El sáb, 29-11-2003 a las 12:43, Christian Rose escribió: > ons 2003-11-26 klockan 19.26 skrev Ole Laursen: > > > Of course, "developer-app" doesn't fit in this scheme and doesn't match > > > any GNOME release that I know of, and I'm not sure why it was added when > > > we moved to the current version of the status pages to begin with. > > > Perhaps Carlos can answer that. > > > > I think it is nice to have the development tools separated somehow. I > > think the status pages should help us prioritize what we translate, > > and translating developer tools is (at least for Danish) somewhat > > silly as long as there are important untranslated end-user tools. > > Yes, but I think introducing an artificial "developer-app" section is > confusing, since there is no such release. I think the only artificial > section we should have is "extras", because we need a section that > covers everything that is not part of any release. All the other > sections should match actual releases. developer-app was a proposed section with the GNOME 2.0 release (or 2.2, I don't remember it correctly...) Now it's not used so I'm with you, just remove it. > > I also think we should distinguish between the need for "categorization" > and simply "information" here. Do we need to put developer applications, > text editors, email clients, file managers, etc. all on different status > pages? Probably not. Could we perhaps still display some very brief > information about what type of application every module is on the status > pages? Perhaps. Yes, but that's a MAINTAINER task, perhaps they could add a file to their code tree so we could just copy the description from that file and show it inside status pages. Cheers. > > > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- Carlos Perelló Marín Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmadadigitalmente