Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 04:19:53 +0800
On 2003-05-20(Tue) 23:45:51 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
[.....]
> The same argument comes up periodically with the web-devel module(s) as
> well. That has some big binary files in it and takes forever to update.
> I think the feeling over there is to try and move the binary files off
> somewhere else as well (although it is not happening yet).
Perhaps there should be a kitchen-sink cvs module soon. :)
Abel
>
> Malcolm
>
> --
> Why be difficult when, with a little bit of effort, you could be
> impossible.
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]