Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 03:18:39 +0800
On 2003-05-18(Sun) 13:17:21 +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 12:10, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> > Currently, the gnome-i18n module takes a long time to check out, partly
> > due to the Sun l10n style guides inside gnome-i18n module. It looks like
> > we could have saved around 25% of space/time by compressing the
> > PostScript files and FrameMaker sources in style guides:
[....]
> > Now another question remains: what should be used to compress them?
> > bzip2? gzip?
>
> Big binary files have no business in CVS imho.
Are you confusing something else with what I said?
Abel
>
>
> Regards
> Yanko
>
>
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]