Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- From: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti declera com>
- To: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>
- Cc: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- Date: 18 May 2003 13:17:21 +0300
On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 12:10, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> Currently, the gnome-i18n module takes a long time to check out, partly
> due to the Sun l10n style guides inside gnome-i18n module. It looks like
> we could have saved around 25% of space/time by compressing the
> PostScript files and FrameMaker sources in style guides:
>
> [deaddog@localhost CVS.GNOME.ORG]$ du -s gnome-i18n*
> 77852 gnome-i18n
> 56488 gnome-i18n.compressed
>
> I think compressing them won't cause any problem, since there is no
> change since the first commit 2 years ago, and it's unknown at all if
> there will be any future update.
>
> Now another question remains: what should be used to compress them?
> bzip2? gzip?
Big binary files have no business in CVS imho.
Regards
Yanko
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]