Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <deaddog deaddog org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Is gnome-i18n module too fat?
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:10:20 +0800
Currently, the gnome-i18n module takes a long time to check out, partly
due to the Sun l10n style guides inside gnome-i18n module. It looks like
we could have saved around 25% of space/time by compressing the
PostScript files and FrameMaker sources in style guides:
[deaddog@localhost CVS.GNOME.ORG]$ du -s gnome-i18n*
77852 gnome-i18n
56488 gnome-i18n.compressed
I think compressing them won't cause any problem, since there is no
change since the first commit 2 years ago, and it's unknown at all if
there will be any future update.
Now another question remains: what should be used to compress them?
bzip2? gzip?
Abel
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]