2005-June Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs,
Vincent Untz
Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable],
Mike Emmel
Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution,
Danilo Šegan
Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE],
Owen Taylor
Subversion on container,
Jeff Waugh
Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches,
Olav Vitters
Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Martin Sevior
- Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Jeff Waugh
- Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release),
Christian Rose
- New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Rodrigo Moya
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
msevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Bill Haneman
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Martin Sevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Vincent Untz
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Martin Sevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Christian Rose
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
msevior
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Bill Haneman
- Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite],
Mark McLoughlin
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
msevior
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
Murray Cumming
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3,
Christian Rose
- Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease),
Olav Vitters
- Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release,
Vincent Untz
List of maintainers & tips for maintainers,
Vincent Untz
Change in coordinatorship for the GNOME Translation Project,
Christian Rose
Problems in building HAL from CVS using jhbuild,
Baishampayan Ghose
Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.,
Mark Galassi
Re: Subversion migration.,
Mikael Hallendal
Mail converted by MHonArc