2005-June Archive by Date

• Messages sorted by: [ Thread ] [ Date ] [ Author ]
• Other months

02 June 2005

• Re: Subversion migration.  Mikael Hallendal

03 June 2005

• Re: Subversion migration.  Luis Villa
• Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.  Mark Galassi
• Problems in building HAL from CVS using jhbuild  Baishampayan Ghose
• Change in coordinatorship for the GNOME Translation Project  Christian Rose
• Re: Change in coordinatorship for the GNOME Translation Project  Jeff Waugh

06 June 2005

• Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Problems in building HAL from CVS using jhbuild  Olav Vitters
• Re: Problems in building HAL from CVS using jhbuild  David Zeuthen

08 June 2005

• Re: Change in coordinatorship for the GNOME Translation Project  Danilo Šegan

09 June 2005

• List of maintainers & tips for maintainers  Vincent Untz
• Re: List of maintainers & tips for maintainers  Bastien Nocera
• Re: List of maintainers & tips for maintainers  Jeff Waugh

11 June 2005

• Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release  Martin Sevior
• Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release  Jeff Waugh
• Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release  Vincent Untz
• Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 Development Release)  Christian Rose

12 June 2005

• New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Jeff Waugh
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Rodrigo Moya
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Jeff Waugh

13 June 2005

• Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease)  msevior
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Mark McLoughlin
• Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease)  Murray Cumming
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Christian Rose
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3  Christian Rose
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Christian Rose
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Jeff Waugh

14 June 2005

• Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Olav Vitters

15 June 2005

• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Martin Sevior
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Mark McLoughlin
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Bill Haneman
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Mark McLoughlin
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Olav Vitters
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Olav Vitters
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Olav Vitters
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Alex Graveley
• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Martin Wehner

16 June 2005

• Re: Bugzilla: Reducing bugspam and finding patches  Vincent Untz

18 June 2005

• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Christian Rose
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Christian Rose
• Re: Productivity suite (was Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.11.3 DevelopmentRelease)  Olav Vitters
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Jeff Waugh

19 June 2005

• Subversion on container  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Subversion on container  Mikael Hallendal

20 June 2005

• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  msevior
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  msevior
• Re: Subversion on container  Ross Golder
• Re: Subversion on container  Miguel de Icaza
• Re: Subversion on container  Miguel de Icaza
• Re: Subversion on container  mneptok
• Re: Subversion on container  James Henstridge
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Bill Haneman
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Bill Haneman
• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Vincent Untz
• Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Owen Taylor
• Re: Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Kjartan Maraas

21 June 2005

• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Danilo Šegan
• Re: Subversion on container  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Davyd Madeley
• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Not Zed
• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Not Zed
• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Not Zed
• Re: Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Owen Taylor
• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Luis Villa
• Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution  Not Zed
• Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]  Owen Taylor
• Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]  Bill Haneman
• Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]  Owen Taylor
• Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]  Mike Emmel
• Re: GTK+ 2.7.0 released [unstable]  younker
• Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs  Vincent Untz

22 June 2005

• Re: Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs  Bastien Nocera

23 June 2005

• Re: Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Ross Golder
• Re: Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Owen Taylor
• Re: Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs  John Williams
• Re: Product specific guidelines for triaging bugs  Harish Krishnaswamy

27 June 2005

• Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]  Martin Sevior
• Relocation of gnome servers [OUTAGE]  Owen Taylor