Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:58:18 +1000
<quote who="Christian Rose">
> > We're not really going in the opposite direction, because there will
> > still be the beautifully integrated and coherent Desktop "product".
> > However, we'll create more opportunities for projects to identify
> > themselves with GNOME, be *part* of GNOME, and join the GNOME release
> > process without a lot of hassle.
>
> So we will allow more projects to call themselves "GNOME", without
> actually being GNOME?
Essentially, yes.
> Which brings us to another issue. When and how was it decided that Abiword
> should be included in the productivity suite? It's already listed as
> "included", although I've seen no public discussion (or even consensus)
> about it.
Nor has there been a lot of discussion/consensus about the productivity
suite -> I think Vincent was very keen and just created it straight away. :)
- Jeff
--
OSCON 2005: August 1st-5th http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2005/
"On Tuesday I saw Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon with Zack and two
ladies whom I presume are gracious." - Seth Schoen
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]