Re: bug stats weirdness



> > But perhaps this should become a separate report, it is a pretty large
> > table. Maybe it is too big and too much info to scan even. Hmmm..??
> > What do you guys and gal think?
> 
> I think it's a bit big. 

I agree! I was just presenting the kind of info I think might be
usefull.

> Wayne, Andrew also had some thoughts on this
> here: 
> 
> http://lists.gnome.org/archives/gnome-bugsquad/2002-August/msg00023.html

Hmm percentages seem nive to have too.

> That said, I think the numbers Aschwin is asking for would probably be
> useful- just not sure that seeing how each category has changed weekly
> is quite so necessary, unless we can figure out a better way to look at
> it all.

I agree, we should try to find a way of presenting the information
without it becoming an overwhelming amount of it to parse with the eyes.

> 
> > > 
> > > I could even be clever and let the user select combinations of these
> > > keywords...
> > 
> > I am not sure if that would be worth the effort, a breakdown of keywords
> > themselves are allready on the keyword page.
> 
> Note that the numbers on the keywords page are next to useless since
> they include closed bugs.

Ah!

-Aschwin




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]