Re: bug stats weirdness
- From: Aschwin van der Woude <aschwin van der woude creanor com>
- To: Wayne Schuller <k_wayne linuxpower org>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vincent vuntz net>, "Bugsquad list (gnome)" <gnome-bugsquad gnome org>, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus linuxrising org>
- Subject: Re: bug stats weirdness
- Date: 08 Nov 2002 10:56:44 +0200
> On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 20:47, Aschwin van der Woude wrote:
> > Good point! What if the table could have a break-down on the version
> > tag. So it would list: Total, untagged, GNOMEVER1.4, GNOMEVER2.0,
> > GNOMEVER2.1.
>
> We definitely need to change to this version.
>
> When I get some time, I will simply add a drop down menu for the user to
> select one of these keywords and regenerate the list.
I thought of this structure:
http://www.linux-aktivaattori.org/twiki/bin/view/Organization/GnomeBugReportProposal
But perhaps this should become a separate report, it is a pretty large
table. Maybe it is too big and too much info to scan even. Hmmm..??
What do you guys and gal think?
>
> I could even be clever and let the user select combinations of these
> keywords...
I am not sure if that would be worth the effort, a breakdown of keywords
themselves are allready on the keyword page. But then again it might be
usefull to also have it breakdown on product.
>
> But certainly it seems the GNOME2 keyword is dead and we should not be
> using it... is that right?
It is not that we shouldn't... we can't! :-)
-A.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]