On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:13:38PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote: > > gtk+ is LGPL2 or later, so this one's fine at least. > > As I said, Boxes COPYING file came straight form gtk+. (which you > could also update the address btw) > > So how come gtk+ is fine and not boxes? :) What I meant is that gtk+ is fine with respect to licence compatibility with LGPLv2.1 Boxes is a new app, so it's weird to use an obsolete licence for it, hence this proposal. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpTBG09Owjdf.pgp
Description: PGP signature