Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:13:38PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> > gtk+ is LGPL2 or later, so this one's fine at least.
> As I said, Boxes COPYING file came straight form gtk+. (which you
> could also update the address btw)
> So how come gtk+ is fine and not boxes? :)

What I meant is that gtk+ is fine with respect to licence compatibility
with LGPLv2.1
Boxes is a new app, so it's weird to use an obsolete licence for it, hence
this proposal.


Attachment: pgpTBG09Owjdf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]