Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> While updating the FSF address in the license file, I noticed we are
> using the older LGPLv2 instead of LGPLv2.1. The differences between
> the 2 are minor, I think we should go with the newer one.

  ACK from my side but since its a licensing matter I'd want another
ACK on this one before re-licensing. Marc-Andre?


Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]