Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2

I suppose there is no incompatibility between usage of LGPL 2 and 2.1
libraries. In this case, updating to LGPL to 2.1 is fine for me.

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:33:58PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> Wrt changing to GPL, I am happy if people take some of the code and put it
>> in a LGPL library... that's why I prefer LGPL, but feel free to explain if
>> that's a bad idea.
> If you want maximum reuse, that's what BSD-like licenses are for :) As far
> as I'm concerned, I generally prefer GPL for apps, and relicense the bits
> that could go in a library as LGPL (either when asked for it, or even while
> initially writing the code). Anyway, that wasn't a real suggestion, just a
> mention in passing.
> Christophe

Marc-André Lureau

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]