Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 06:48:07PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com> wrote:
> > I suspect you can't relicense LGPL2.1 code to LGPL2 easily as it as the
> > lgpl v2.1 has an additional restriction.
> That's not what I meant. I was saying that I suppose there is no
> incompability with usage of LGPL2 libraries (ex: Gtk) with LGPL2.1
> code (like boxes when we bump). With this assumption, we can update
> it.

Honestly I don't know. I guess it's fine or this issue would have been
known by now. gtk+ is LGPL2 or later, so this one's fine at least.


Attachment: pgpCGX7xfGVIj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]