Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2

From: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau redhat com>
To: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre lureau gmail com>
Cc: gnome-boxes-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:39:24 +0100

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 06:42:58PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> I suppose there is no incompatibility between usage of LGPL 2 and 2.1
> libraries. In this case, updating to LGPL to 2.1 is fine for me.

I suspect you can't relicense LGPL2.1 code to LGPL2 easily as it as the
lgpl v2.1 has an additional restriction.

Christophe

Attachment: pgpMVjYBKO4gs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc=2DAndr=E9_Lureau?=

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Update FSF address
  - From: Christophe Fergeau
- [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: Christophe Fergeau
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc=2DAndr=E9_Lureau?=
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: Christophe Fergeau
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use LGPLv2.1 instead of LGPLv2
  - From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc=2DAndr=E9_Lureau?=

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]