Re: hardware synthesisers.
- From: "Tom and Esther Ward" <tward1978 earthlink net>
- To: "Shaun Oliver" <shaun oliver optusnet com au>
- Cc: <gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: hardware synthesisers.
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 12:29:28 -0400
Remember that whatever is developed for gnome-speech for synth drivers needs
to be multiplatform. Gnopernicus is currently working on Solaris, Linux,
and even FreeBSD and a driver should in most cases be extended to all of
I don't know about speech-dispatcher, but is it cross platform?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Oliver" <shaun oliver optusnet com au>
To: "Janina Sajka" <janina rednote net>
Cc: "Gnome Accessability discussion list"
<gnome-accessibility-list gnome org>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:47 AM
Subject: hardware synthesisers.
> just on that,
> could speech-dispatcher not be used as an interface for gnopernicus and
> the various synthesisers? as opposed to writing a complete driver subset
> for gnopernicus itself?
> Mind you, that might be a major undertaking in itself.
> in any event, hardware synth support would be a great plus and like
> janina said we're in the minority but, why throw the things away if we
> can still get good use out of them anywhere we can within our computing
> Another thing to consider is the fact that as stated earlier software
> speech is not always practicable.
> I can't say any more without covering old ground other than that if
> hardware synthesiser manufacturers insist on making people sign
> non-disclosure agreements just for the technical specs on their product,
> we'll see alot of them paint themselves into a corner.
> it is beyond me why companies do such things. oh well, that's my bitch
> for the day.
> Shaun Oliver
> "I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person."
> email: shaun oliver optusnet com au
> WEB: http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
> IRC: irc.awesomechat.net:6666
> IRCNICK: blindman
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
] [Thread Prev