Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
- From: "ugajin talktalk net" <ugajin talktalk net>
- To: <kevin ve3syb ca>, <gimp-user-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:19:15 +0000 (GMT)
I take the point.
Thanks.
----Original Message----
From: kevin ve3syb ca
Date: 22/03/2016 20:34
To: <gimp-user-list gnome org>
Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, ugajin talktalk net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is
noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python
scripts
the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script.
The
times it takes to load the Python interepreter would be the lag you
are
talking about.
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that
distract
Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why
we're
| powerful!"
#include <disclaimer/favourite> | --Chris Hardwick
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address: gimp-user-list gnome org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]