Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

["ugajin talktalk net" <ugajin talktalk net>]

It is difficult to estimate. Interstingly perhaps, (as noted by Ofnuts) 
it can be significantly more, perhaps 2, or even 3 times longer on a 
first run. 

Thanks.

-u


> ----Original Message----
> From: paynekj hotmail com
> Date: 23/03/2016 11:36
> To: "gimp-user-list gnome org"<gimp-user-list gnome org>
> Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
> How much extra time are you seeing with the Python dialog? 
>
> Here on a Windows 7 machine, I can't be sure I'm seeing any 
difference, so it must be less than 0.5 seconds.
> Kevin 
>
> ________________________________________
> From: gimp-user-list <gimp-user-list-bounces gnome org> on behalf of 
ugajin talktalk net <ugajin talktalk net>
> Sent: 23 March 2016 10:22
> To: ofnuts gmx com; gimp-user-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
> Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching 
GIMP
> does not seem to make a noticeable  difference.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > ----Original Message----
> > From: ofnuts gmx com
> > Date: 22/03/2016 21:04
> > To: <gimp-user-list gnome org>
> > Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
> >
> > On 22/03/16 21:34, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> > > On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, ugajin talktalk net wrote:
> > > > I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is
> noticeable
> > > > lag when executing python-fu.
> > >
> > > Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python
> > > scripts the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the
> > > script. The times it takes to load the Python interepreter would be
> > > the lag you are talking about.
> >
> > Possible. I don't experience such lags but then on a Linux system
> there
> > is always a Python script running somewhere so the interpreter is
> > already loaded, and it's only a matter of initializing a new
> instance.
> > But then on OSX I would expect the interpreter to be kept in the IO
> > buffers, so the lag would be noticeable only on the first execution.
> A
> > good test would be to start an interactive python session before
> > starting Gimp, keep it open while Gimp runs and see if the lag
> remains.
> > _______________________________________________
> > gimp-user-list mailing list
> > List address:    gimp-user-list gnome org
> > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

> > List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-user-list gnome org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-user-list gnome org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list