Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

["ugajin talktalk net" <ugajin talktalk net>]

I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable 
lag when executing python-fu. 

E.g., when I run Akkana Peck's show_py_ui.py plugin, and compare this 
with GIMP.org's test-sphere.scm script there is a big difference in 
performance up to launcing the UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller 
file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments). 

Is it just me on pre-build OSX?

Thanks.

-u


> ----Original Message----
> From: ofnuts gmx com
> Date: 22/03/2016 16:34
> To: <gimp-user-list gnome org>
> Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
> On 22/03/16 12:27, ugajin talktalk net wrote:
> > Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with 
script-
> > fu?
> >
> > I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
> > noticeably lagged.
> >
> > I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
> >
> > -u
>
> A script is normally just glue around operations carried out by Gimp, 
so 
> the efficiency of the script language is normally fairly irrelevant.
>
> But different scripts could be using different operations for 
equivalent 
> results, one set of operations being more efficient...
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-user-list gnome org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list