Re: [Gimp-developer] present xcf as what it is, a gimp project file format

On 06/17/12 00:32, peter sikking wrote:


because it is not fruitful to have a line-by-line refuting match.

I was not expect or seeking a refuting match, I made constructive suggestion.

I was naively expecting it to be considered and possibly discussed. Not refuted or ignored. Or attract insults.

instead, I showed where the real meat of the argument is.

the ‘match’ is played in a completely different ballpark than
where you wanted to kick around a bit with this topic. sorry.

this is the best I could do to keep things constructive here.


         founder + principal interaction architect
             man + machine interface works

So you seem to be saying this is not the place to discuss the way gimp UI is being developed. Refuting matches are held elsewhere. Sorry, private party.

May as well shut down the list. then.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]