Re: [Gimp-developer] present xcf as what it is, a gimp project file format

[gg <gg catking net>]

On 06/17/12 00:32, peter sikking wrote:
> yes.
>
> because it is not fruitful to have a line-by-line refuting match.

I was not expect or seeking  a refuting match, I made constructive 
suggestion.

I was naively expecting it to be considered and possibly discussed. Not 
refuted or ignored. Or attract insults.

> instead, I showed where the real meat of the argument is.
>
> the ‘match’ is played in a completely different ballpark than
> where you wanted to kick around a bit with this topic. sorry.
>
> this is the best I could do to keep things constructive here.
>
>      --ps
>
>          founder + principal interaction architect
>              man + machine interface works

So you seem to be saying this is not the place to discuss the way gimp 
UI is being developed. Refuting matches are held elsewhere. Sorry, 
private party.

May as well shut down the list. then.