Re: [Gimp-developer] What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt
- From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif shlomifish org>
- To: patrick dbp-consulting com
- Cc: phorgan1 gmail com, gimp-developer-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:56:02 +0300
Hi Patrick,
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 20:30:29 -0700
Patrick Horgan <phorgan1 gmail com> wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 02:43 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > ...elision by patrick...
> > Well, calling GNU Autotools "Autohell" is not an ad-hominem attack.
> > However, assuming that since I called it "Autohell" it is wrong (or
> > "flamebait"), is. See:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
> Lol! Look in that article under abusive. It is exactly ad-hominem.
> By doing a personal attack, calling it autohell, instead of having
> anything to say about why it's good or not, you exactly fulfill the
> definition of an ad-hominem attack.
Well, I have looked in that article under abusive and I still don't see
how my page constitutes of an ad-hominem attack just by the fact it calls
GNU Autotools "Autohell".
An Ad-hominem attack has the following form:
1. Sophie says something.
2. Jack finds something questionable or wrong about Sophie herself.
3. Jack concludes that Sophie is wrong due to #2.
The Wikipedia page gives the following examples:
<<<<
* "You can't believe John when he says the proposed policy would help the economy. He doesn't even have a job."
* "Candidate Jane's proposal about zoning is ridiculous. She was caught cheating on her taxes in 2003."
* "What would Mary know about fixing cars? She is a woman." (an example of Ad feminam)
* "What makes you so smart and all-knowing to deny God's existence? You haven't even finished school."
* "Your fashion opinion isn't valid, you can't even afford new shoes."
* "Your exposition is highly correct and valid, but you don't have enough academic degree" (an example of the Credential fallacy). [7]
>>>>
Now my page ( http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/autohell/ ) gives many
valid reasons why CMake is superior and GNU Autotools
is inferior, and as a result concludes it is valid to nickname Autotools "Autohell"
as a derogatory name, just based on their own deficiencies. So how does it
consist of an ad-hominem attack?
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
UNIX Fortune Cookies - http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/
He who reinvents the wheel, may actually invent a much better wheel.
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]