Re: [Gimp-developer] What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt
- From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif shlomifish org>
- To: patrick dbp-consulting com
- Cc: phorgan1 gmail com, gimp-developer-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:43:38 +0300
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:23:27 -0700
Patrick Horgan <phorgan1 gmail com> wrote:
> On 07/29/2012 05:17 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 02:51:44PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >>> Do we need to change to CMake? Nobody has given
> >>> reasons so far, just assumed that we'd like to switch to CMake.
> >>> It would substitute one hell for another.
> >> Well, I have given many reasons here:
> >>
> >> http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/autohell/
> >>
> >> You should have followed and read the link.
> When I see terms like autohell I assume it's flame baiting and don't
> read it. I don't have time for un-civility. If someone can't make a
> point without using an ad-hominem attack I automatically assume they
> have no real point.
Well, calling GNU Autotools "Autohell" is not an ad-hominem attack. However,
assuming that since I called it "Autohell" it is wrong (or "flamebait"), is.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Why I Love Perl - http://shlom.in/joy-of-perl
Mastering ‘cat’ is almost as difficult as herding cats.
— http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/Mastering-Cat/
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]