> The point about that really is that the recent campaign seems to have
> demonstrated that in principle, GNOME already has the infrastructure which
> could allow them to accept money for any given crowdfunding campaign on
> behalf of community driven projects (and any general fundraising too, of
> course). Assuming that this infrastructure is based on free software and
> that it comes without the same kinds of fees as all the crowdfunding sites
> do.
It might be possible to create something like this, but at the moment
GNOME doesn't have the same setup.
AFAIK there's a difference between accepting money yourself and an organization on your behalf. It might not be as easy as it appears.
Instead of talking about what should not be done, I'd prefer if we
encourage something to be done.
I don't see how having a banner which endorses an campaign automatically
leads to endorsing something else (the company making the campaign
possible). Maybe sometimes, but at the moment we link to Facebook,
Twitter and Google+ for IMO entirely logical and practical reasons.