Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

[Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>]

On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:19 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:


> Because you are being disruptive on the Foundation List.

Again. That's your believe. Good for you.

> People are not interested in having this argument and you are causing
> people to unsubscribe to the Foundation List and to quit
> participating.

That's their action. And you can't control that.

(what's your point?)

> If you do support GNOME, then please stop turning every thread into an
> argument. Respond to things you perceive as argumentative off list. 

I do support GNOME. I want its Foundation to be strong.

> If people don't respond, assume they are not interested in that topic.

Sure.

> I will not be replying to this thread publicly any more. 

Although your reply is fair, I did ask these three questions:

  1) > Why didn't the GNOME Foundation take a stance on that?

  2) > Wasn't that formulation starting an argument with me?

    3) > And how wasn't it? If it wasn't.


Why aren't you answering those questions?



Cheers,


Philip


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be