El dv 04 de 08 del 2006 a les 22:11 +1000, en/na Jeff Waugh va escriure: > Hold on... You're suggesting that instead of creating a document with this > content, we should update another document with this content. Not "with this content" i.e. adding an extra chapter, but making sure the principles and recommendation we are missing in the current documents appear there. My basic point is: the GNOME Foundation charter has already everything we need to behave, be respectful and productive. It is not a coincidence that the community that came up with that charter and this Foundation is doing well behaving, being respectful and productive. It is possible that after these years the charter needs updating to keep being a valid referent for the GNOME project nowadays. If this is the case, let's update it. Doing the process of updating the charter would be a failure? I don't see why, this process could be healthy for the community, and the result would be stronger and more sounded. In the meantime the list of recommendations could be discussed, tested, improved, applied (it was being applied before being written in a wiki page anyway). > Interesting > idea [1], and certainly food for thought, but... totally dodging the point > of the discussion! I tried to nail precisely the point of the discussion: it is the backbone of the GNOME Foundation that needs to be healthy, adding a rib doesn't solve the problem (if there is a problem). > Can we stop arguing about *where to put it* and *what to call it*, and go > back to talking about what should go in it, and the shared values we want to > express? :-) Jeff, it is normal that people wonders what is this box and what you want to do it in order to help providing the content you want for that box. To me these principles can stay at http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct , they are fine. But since you are asking for acceptance from the Foundation and "blessing" of the board I think the content and the label needs to be diferent. And the idea of integrating these principles to the current principles of the Foundation is pertinent and sensible, I think. But it seems I keep missing the point. Sorry for making you waste extra time, all we have better things to do than reading long threads leading nowhere. I give up. Good luck with the document. Really. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aix=F2?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E9s?= una part d'un missatge, signada digitalment