On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:55 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Rui Miguel Seabra"> > > > Nothing, except that you don't get it. > > You're reading the wrong (old) copyright assignment document, btw. It's what's on the website. I described how I reached it, and it was done in a very natural form. Your quote in another email seems to indicate its changes are mostly: Ximian -> Novell DFSGL -> OSI > I am not sure you are interested in resolving this issue, and I don't > believe it seriously impacts your contribution to GNOME, so I'm not at all > impressed by your "outrage" and tone here. I fail to see where am I not interested in solving this issue. You're standing behind lies and saying "trust me, the issue is solved". My outrage goes at the attempt of circunventing the GPL that this represents. It outrages me even more to see a GF board member stand by it. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part