On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:58 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Rui Miguel Seabra"> > > It's supposed to be GPL, not GPL, or anything else. > > > So you consider acceptable to include as an official module one with a > > licensing scheme created with the purpose of circunventing the GPL? > > I am not convinced you understand the discussion or issues at hand. And I reject your dismissiveness. > You seem > to think copyright assignment and the GPL are somehow related. They are not. But one can be, and is, used with the intention of cirunventing the other. > Perhaps you should refrain from posting until you have some context on what > we are discussing here. Perhaps you should refrain your blind trust and use an analytical insight. Instead of a problem in need of solving, you react as if my intention was attacking a project (that I love to use) and its developers. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part