Re: FSpotFS

[Matias Aguirre <matiasaguirre gmail com>]

Sounds promising but this implies that F-Spot needs to be running first,
losing a bit the idea of a transparent filesystem. It's a strong
dependency IMO, but surely having an improve on process time making the
filesystem more reliable.

BTW, I've added support to files moving/copying, this means that the
file will be copied to collection directory and tagged properly.

Something I've found was the need of use gconf to get collection root
directory, why it's not stored on meta table? I don't like this
dependency :)

Thanks you all for your time!
Matias

Excerpts from Ruben Vermeersch's message of Thu Jun 03 15:51:12 -0300 2010:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:05 -0300, Matias Aguirre wrote:
> > Excerpts from Fabian Kneißl's message of Thu Jun 03 07:12:19 -0300 2010:
> > > Great work! Really neat!
> 
> At some point it'll probably be best to convert this to use the DBus API
> of F-Spot, which will avoid a lot of headaches and potential problems.
> 
> But I have to admit that our DBus API probably isn't mature enough (by a
> long stretch) to support things like this.
> 
> Cool project though, keep it up. Give us a ping on IRC if you want to
> hack along on F-Spot to make it easier for you to build/maintain this.
-- 
Matías Aguirre <matiasaguirre gmail com>