Re: [Evolution] Annoyance with "next message" order

[Pete Biggs <pete biggs org uk>]

> My main issue with the sorting, FWIW, is the fact that we sort on the 
> Date: header and not the time the message was actually *delivered*. So 
> when we get a misdated mail from the future, it sits as the "newest" 
> message in the mailbox until the world finally catches up with it. Or 
> we get annoyed and delete it.

Add a column called "Recieved" (which is the date received) and sort on
that.

P.