Re: [Evolution] Speed of restore - Evolution 3.2.3
- From: Steve T <stevetucknott yahoo co uk>
- To: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Speed of restore - Evolution 3.2.3
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:16:45 +0000
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 11:25 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:29 +0000, Steve T wrote:
> I thought it was the suggested was of migration between disparate
> releases?
> If I want to move an 'x' Evolution release to say a 'y' release, what
> way would there
> be of doing it without backup/restore?
You need only upgrade your Evolution package, and any necessary data
migration will be handled automatically on the next start.
"yum upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade" (depending on your distro) is
sufficient. Or, if upgrading your whole system from installation media,
choosing a non-destructive upgrade option is sufficient.
We have never recommended the Back/Restore tool as an upgrade solution.
Matthew Barnes
OK, I must have misunderstood what was being said. I thought I had seen backup/restore mentioned in conjunction with upgrading, and I can find this:
http://library.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/index.html.en#data-migration-and-sync
...that appears to link backup/restore with migrating and synch'ing (which is what I'm doing)...but I don't think it was that that I read before. I thought I had read it in some FAQ somewhere.
I would have thought that a specific Evolution backup/restore is a good thing. It gives a single file that can be ported, rather than having to know where Evolution stores it's data.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]