Re: [Evolution] evolution exchange

[MHR <mhullrich gmail com>]

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Paul Smith <paul mad-scientist us> wrote:
> First, this comes up every so often so it's worth it to look for
> previous threads.  Second, your assertion that "most other email lists
> of this type" use reply-to-list is not correct; in fact as far as I
> recall I don't belong to a single mailing list that uses reply-to-list
> (and I belong to a LOT of mailing lists).

Interesting - I don't actually belong to too many email discussion
lists, all them are technical, like this one, and all the others
(CentOS, GNOME, rpmforge, OOo) use the reply-to-all as the default.
On the other hand, I belong to several hundred discussion groups
(mostly Yahoo groups) and almost all of them are set up for
reply-to-all, with the exceptions being the newletter-type groups
(reply-to-moderator).

> Nope, it's a PITA to you and some others, but it's absolutely the
> preferred behavior for me and some others on this list.  And, probably,
> there are some who don't care one way or the other :-).

Okay, point well taken.  I suppose it's a matter of habit - I usually
use "Reply" rather than "Reply-to-All" and have become accustomed to
it.  Six of one....

> FYI: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Interesting bit of history there.  Thanks.

mhr