Re: [Evolution] Migration of existing evolution to new partition? (LONG)

[Bram Mertens <bram-mertens linux be>]

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 09:16 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 11:55 +0100, Bram Mertens wrote: 
> > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 16:38 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > [...]
> > > There's really not much else to it, your best bet is the source, or
> > > ask specific questions on this list.  There are many references in the
> > > archives to "migration" of data and backing up data, its basically the
> > > #1 Frequently-asked & answered-Question.
> >
> > Sorry but I'd have to disagree for version 2.x, what files did or did
> > not have to be backed up for version 1.x has indeed been covered many
> > times on this list.  However the file-structure has changed from 1.x to
> > 2.x which is why I asked this question again a couple of days ago (my
> > message "backing up evolution 2.x" of Wed, 16 Feb 2005).
> Huh? ITs been discussed about 20 times AT LEAST.

Sorry, I did search my and the online archives of this list and all I
have found is Celsun's thread I mentioned yesterday. I've been looking
further back into my archive and found another thread which indeed
answers one of my questions:
On 26 December, Ron Johnson replied to Rick DeNatale that
~/.evolution/cache doesn't have to be backed up. So indeed I missed that
one.

However I can't find a single message between 1 November and now
detailing which files can be safely omitted from a backup.

Can anybody please tell me which of the following files in
~/.evolution/mail/local/ will be rebuilt by evo and can therefore be
deleted (for POP3 accounts)?
*.cmeta
*.ev-summary
*.ibex.index
*.ibex.index.data

TIA

Bram
-- 
# Mertens Bram "M8ram"   <bram-mertens linux be>   Linux User #349737 #
# debian testing            kernel 2.6.8-1-686     i686     512MB RAM #
# 10:18:21 up 14 days, 14:05, 11 users,  load average: 0.59, 0.49, 0.49 #