On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 12:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 13:48 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 12:35 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 22:22 +0800, Not Zed wrote:Lastly, if Evo did it the way most clients do, it would betrivial todeal with the less common case of *not* wanting to sendattachments:just delete them from the attachments bar the way you do whencomposinga new message.We do this by default. The user must change a setting for thisnot tohappen.Actually, the setting means "forward everything as an attachment, including the text of the message". There's no reason (logically)not toinclude attachments even when forwarding inline or quoted.consistancy with replying. also, if you are quoting then you are interested in the body text and not necessarily the attachments anyway.Consistency is fine when it makes sense. However if I reply to someone who sent me attachments, I would rarely if ever want to send them back to him.
Please read it again. We are not talking about replying. (in that case, you do not want the attachment) We are talking about forwarding e-mail and in this case (most of the time) you want the attachment to go with the e-mail, email inline and attachment attached. Of course this is my own preference
If I'm passing his message on to someone else, I usually *do* want to send everything, but sometimes I want the option of editing or commenting on his text. We could go round and round on this, but I do think it's a common case. poc
Tom
_______________________________________________ evolution maillist - evolution lists ximian com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part