Re: [Evolution] forwarding of attachments

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 12:26 -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > > consistancy with replying. also, if you are quoting then you are
> > > interested in the body text and not necessarily the attachments
> > > anyway.
> >
> > Consistency is fine when it makes sense. However if I reply to
> someone
> > who sent me attachments, I would rarely if ever want to send them
> back
> > to him. 
> Please read it again. We are not talking about replying. (in that
> case,
> you do not want the attachment) We are talking about forwarding e-mail
> and in this case (most of the time) you want the attachment to go with
> the e-mail, email inline and attachment attached.

Please read my reply again. I'm commenting on Jeffrey's comment, in
which he justified the Forward behaviour in terms of consistency with
Reply. I agree with you on this, not with Jeffrey.

poc