Merhaba, On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 10:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
vFolders only use memory proportional to how many total messages you have in the query set, and in the query result set, and they use less memory than real folders per message, so they don't consume 'loads of memory' in a relative sense.
OK, I was wrong. It's the kernel being totally broken :) trying to free-up more memory to get more filesystem cache while evolution tries to update vfolders and the startup process is the main performance bottleneck of vfolder feature IMHO. I would love if, as I said in the several times on IRC, Evolution had the ability of incrementally updating vfolders at startup after a complete shutdown. You know, `make` won't try to rebuild a file unless it was changed. It's the same thing, Evolution won't try to scan a folder tree to get a vfolder up-to-date, unless it was changed somehow. I don't know if this is something possible, but it would vastly gear it up. Anyway, I can live without vfolders. Keep up the good work, -- __________ | | | | Enver ALTIN (a.k.a. skyblue) | | Software developer, IT consultant | FRONT | |==========| FrontSITE Bilgi Teknolojisi A.Ş. |_____SITE_| http://www.frontsite.com.tr/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part