Re: mbox vs. Maildir (was: Re: [Evolution] expunge speed)
- From: Ricardo Amadeo Contreras <aztlan2k yahoo com>
- To: Alexander Skwar <ASkwar digitalprojects com>
- Cc: Evolution Mehl Liste <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: mbox vs. Maildir (was: Re: [Evolution] expunge speed)
- Date: 20 Aug 2001 12:57:25 -0500
On 20 Aug 2001 19:13:27 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Exactly! That's the reason I like mbox better. I've just converted a
mbox with >5000 messages to maildir to do some comparison.
...
Now, also deleting messages from the middle of a mbox isn't as bad as
everyone wants to make you believe. I then deleted the message which
was about in the middle of the file. This only took 3 seconds.
Interesting but I think you would need to do some other tests before you
could really get a feel for performance. I'm not suggesting that you go
out and do an exhaustive test, but it might be nice to look at a few
more cases. For example, you only deleted (i gather from your post) a
single message in each of your test cases. What would happen if you
deleted many messages scattered throughout and then 'expunged'. (If you
have a >5000 message mbox, say deleting 10%... or about 50 messages
scattered throughout the mbox file.) how would this compare against
maildir (or mh)?
And of course you're using a different mua, which may not handle message
deletion in the same way as evolution/camel. (I don't know mutt so I
not in a position to point out the differences) Evolution seems to mark
messages for deletion from a folder and then do them all at once when
you select Action->Expunge (or Empty Trash). Does mutt do each deletion
at the time you mark a message for deletion or does it work similarly to
Evolution's method?
I usually read all of my mail messages and mark everything I don't want
to keep for deletion... by the time I actually expunge (empty trash)
there are probably 30-50 messages, maybe more, marked for deletion.
Personally, I still can't see evidence for choosing one format over the
other. It appears that there are benefits and drawbacks to each format.
I guess it depends on what the situation calls for. I still am curious
as to why mbox was chosen as the default. (historical? most widely
used? actual benefits?)
Thanx for the stats...
Ricardo
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]