Re: [Evolution-hackers] Post-to header implementation

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 17:37 +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 17:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > I wonder if the url shouldn't be more like:
> > 
> > nntp://userr host/#comp.lang.c
> 
> For users it could be more like: "comp.lang.c in news.host.com", the uri
> looks scary. The "plain english" one is longer, yeah, but most of the
> time you dont want to crosspost anyway.. :)

This was more of an internally thing I think.

I'm not sure about the idea:
 1. it does simplify a little bit of code, but the amount of
simplification isn't great (i.e. mostly just url->fragment?url-
>fragment:url->path to url->path in a few places).
 2. its another uri format change (but now thankfully independent of
filters)
 3. i think a better idea would be to put the camel accounts as a camel
account objects, and have all uri's relative to that rather than mapping
to the physical stores.  well maybe its better, thats a big change