Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status of mail-refactor-2 branch todo
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Brett Johnson <brett fc hp com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status of mail-refactor-2 branch todo
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:02:13 -0500
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:08, Dan Winship wrote:
> > As for the keybindings, isn't that what "]" already does (on a freshly
> > selected folder, with no messages selected)? (And I don't think we can
> > distinguish between "new" and "unread" currently, can we?)
>
> Yeah, it does "first unread", not "first new unread", meaning if you
> have any "reminder" messages, they always get hit first.
>
> "First new unread" wouldn't be hard. We'd just have to decide when a
You think? We'd have to track every uid that was there since last we
started the mailer - ugh.
> message stops being "new". (If you lraave a folder with unread messages
> in it, and come back later, and there are new unread messages, is the
> "first new unread message" the same as it was before, or does it
> change?)
I don't think you'd want to ever move it after you've already visited
the folder once, would you?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]