Re: [Evolution-hackers] Status of mail-refactor-2 branch todo



On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:08, Dan Winship wrote:
> > As for the keybindings, isn't that what "]" already does (on a freshly
> > selected folder, with no messages selected)?  (And I don't think we can
> > distinguish between "new" and "unread" currently, can we?)
> 
> Yeah, it does "first unread", not "first new unread", meaning if you
> have any "reminder" messages, they always get hit first.
> 
> "First new unread" wouldn't be hard. We'd just have to decide when a

You think?  We'd have to track every uid that was there since last we
started the mailer - ugh.

> message stops being "new". (If you lraave a folder with unread messages
> in it, and come back later, and there are new unread messages, is the
> "first new unread message" the same as it was before, or does it
> change?)

I don't think you'd want to ever move it after you've already visited
the folder once, would you?





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]