Re: Motivation for having a 'text color' that is invisible
- From: christian ridderstrom gmail com
- To: Dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Motivation for having a 'text color' that is invisible
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:58:09 +0100
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Lars Clausen wrote:
It would indeed have to happen at a very different level. Both
approaches have their uses, I'd say the transparent color would be
easier to fit into the current UI, as it doesn't require an extra toggle
button for all manner of things, and it's probably also easier to code.
For clarity, then: "transparent" means a color setting, while
"undisplayed" means that the (part of the) object is not considered to
exist for any calculations at all, including bounding box, diagram
extends, parenting etc.
This is how I would also interpret 'transparent' v.s. 'undisplayed'.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]