Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Matthieu Sozeau wrote:
> Le 29 Apr 2002 10:33:07 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>
> > > Also class member functions default to virtual - bad choice. When
> > > loading my classes from 0.88.1, they come up as virtual, even though
> > > they weren't in 0.88.1. 
> >
> > Ugh.  I bet some Java programmer did that:) That kind of change should
> > not happen without a version update on the save file and conversion.  Bad
> > Cyrille!  No donut!
> >
> > -Lars
>
> Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting the old "abstract" attribute. This 
> is just a matter of changing 
> +  op->inheritance_type = UML_POLYMORPHIC;
> -  op->inheritance_type = UML_LEAF;
> inside objects/UML/uml.c ~500

I guess Cyrille applied your patch.
Problem is, now a lot of diagrams have been made with POLYMORPHIC as
default.  How can we tell what a missing entry is supposed to be?  Are they
always explicit now?

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?