Re: (L)GPLv3
- From: jhs jsschmid de
- To: "Ryan Lortie" <desrt desrt ca>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: (L)GPLv3
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:49:30 -0000 (UTC)
Hi!
> At the point that your application is used with a LGPLv3 library then it
> would conceptually be 'upgraded' to GPLv3 at that time (so that the
> GPLv2 clause preventing linking with LGPLv3 disappears). This doesn't
> mean that you have to change the licence of existing code -- you just
> keep it "v2 or higher".
So far so good. But if I may want to link against a LGPLv2 library at the
same time it won't work. Because from the matrix, my code will be treated
as GPLv3 which means I am not allow to link against LGPLv2.
I don't know how many (L)GPLv-only modules there are in GNOME, but any of
those will be in trouble when a core library changes its license. As
copyright is usually left to individuals in GNOME it is also nearly
impossible to change those modules.
So, I see pratical problems here...
Regards,
Johannes
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]