Re: (L)GPLv3


> hi Vincent,
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:26 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Do you feel okay with the idea of allowing proprietary apps to use our
>> platform but not GPLv2 apps?
> In short, yes.
> Anybody who has an application that is GPLv2-only and has accepted
> enough contributions that it has become an unreasonable proposition to
> relicense has made a significant mistake.  I don't want to punish them
> or anything, but they are the ones who picked a licence that prevents
> them from linking against just about anything.

Well, while I guess all my modules are LGPL/GPLv2+ would that still
prevent me from linking against LGPLv3 things if I don't convert them to

Also, am I right that GPLv2+ means that I have GPLv2 in the COPYING but
every file include the "or (at your option) any later version" clause?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]