Re: GNOME and non-linux platforms (release team please stand up)

On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:08 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Karl Lattimer <karl qdh org uk>
> wrote:
>         That's not arrogant, arrogant would be someone making a
>         sweeping
>         statement like nobody uses solaris so lets just not care about
>         it, when
>         no evidence is provided to back that up.
> Are you really going to make the argument that Solaris does have a
> non-trivial desktop install user base? What exactly are you getting
> at? Or you decided you'd like to add flames?
> If I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not
> giving me (I know quite a lot about Sun, by the way), then my
> suggestion to you--if you are serious about pursuing this line of
> reasoning--would be to Google some Solaris browser statistics.

Giving >ME< the benefit of the doubt? I just stepped in to correct the
insult you threw at Alberto. 

I'm not arguing one way or the other, but you clearly are. Being
argumentative that is... 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]