Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24
- From: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- To: "Patryk Zawadzki" <patrys pld-linux org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:02:27 +0100
27 mar 2008 kl. 11.18 skrev Patryk Zawadzki:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Martyn Russell
<martyn imendio com> wrote:
Hi,
Currently there are 22 files which either have or should have my/
Gossip
copyright information in libempathy alone. There are 43 source
files. So
half of libempathy is not copyright to you to re-license.
So you are basically saying "I'm -1 because of relicensing problems
that I'm causing myself?" Please point the rest of us to the
discussion where Imendio/Gossip staff gives their reasons against
LGPL.
There is very little such discussion to point at since Xavier still
hasn't formally contacted the authors of Gossip with a request for
such a relicense. We have said that we are not interested in doing the
necessary work for this to happen.
Bottom line is that the entire problem has been ignored and comes up
over and over again when Empathy is being proposed for inclusion in
GNOME. Since the last time around, no effort of solving this has been
made from Empathy developers.
This leaves me wondering whether the plan is to force the Gossip
developers to relicense their code by making us look like the bad
guys. Empathy was forked from Gossip since we disagreed on the right
approach to take, the fact that he choose to reuse Gossip's code in
ways it was not intended is in my opinion his problem, not ours.
I personally don't see why libempathy-gtk needs to be installed as a
library and find this discussion about relicensing moot. Make it an
application library and not something intended for outsiders to use.
I would also like to point out that this is the personal view of the
Gossip developers, not a company stand point against relicensing.
And my personal view (as a gossip developer) is that I don't think
Empathy is the way to do IM in GNOME, which is part of the reason for
the fork in the first place :)
Best Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
--
Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]