Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file

Am Sonntag, den 20.01.2008, 14:26 +0100 schrieb Mathias Hasselmann:
> So let's bring this at some constructive level.

finally, thanks. just wondering why you didn't do that from the
beginning by getting your facts straight before pissing off volunteers
like olav for spending their precious free time on proposing a long-term
fix for the problems we see?
(yes, this was a rant.)

 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]