Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?



On So, 2007-09-23 at 12:49 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 23 septembre 2007, à 12:32 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > 
> > On So, 2007-09-23 at 12:16 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 17:42 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > > > 
> > > > On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 17:13 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > > > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > > > > > hey!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure
> > > > > > if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the
> > > > > > development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks
> > > > > > to a month vs. 6 months). anyway, here is my proposal for including
> > > > > > cheese in 2.22.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean about the development cycle. We have
> > > > > lots of unstable release during those 6 months.
> > > > 
> > > > could you tell me more about that?
> > > 
> > > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone
> > 
> > i thought, you would point me to something else ;) the problem i see, is
> > "unstable releases"... 
> > 
> > i mean: cheese has many new features at each release and this would be
> > then "invisible" for the end user, as it is always an unstable release.
> 
> Then it works fine during the unstable cycle. You'll have to get used to
> feature freeze and stable cycle, though.
> 
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oh, and see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing if you
> > > > > want to have a complete proposal :-)
> > > > 
> > > > isnt my proposal complete?
> > > 
> > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing
> > > 
> > > Everything is in the wiki ;-)
> > 
> > yeah, but what was missing? ;)
> 
> At least jhbuild integration 

i stated in a previous mail, that it was not yet integrated in jhbuild.

> and adding cheese to the list of proposed
> modules on the wiki.

added ;)

daniel 

> 
> Vincent
> 
-- 
this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons
================================================
daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com>
http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel
gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62
fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62
encrypted email preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]