Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?



On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 17:13 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > hey!
> > 
> > im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure
> > if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the
> > development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks
> > to a month vs. 6 months). anyway, here is my proposal for including
> > cheese in 2.22.
> 
> I'm not quite sure what you mean about the development cycle. We have
> lots of unstable release during those 6 months.

could you tell me more about that?

> 
> Oh, and see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing if you
> want to have a complete proposal :-)

isnt my proposal complete?

daniel

> 
> Vincent
> 
-- 
this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons
================================================
daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com>
http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel
gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62
fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62
encrypted email preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]