On So, 2007-09-23 at 12:16 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 17:42 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : > > > > On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 17:13 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit : > > > > hey! > > > > > > > > im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure > > > > if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the > > > > development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks > > > > to a month vs. 6 months). anyway, here is my proposal for including > > > > cheese in 2.22. > > > > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean about the development cycle. We have > > > lots of unstable release during those 6 months. > > > > could you tell me more about that? > > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone i thought, you would point me to something else ;) the problem i see, is "unstable releases"... i mean: cheese has many new features at each release and this would be then "invisible" for the end user, as it is always an unstable release. > > > > > > > Oh, and see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing if you > > > want to have a complete proposal :-) > > > > isnt my proposal complete? > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing > > Everything is in the wiki ;-) yeah, but what was missing? ;) > > Vincent > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part