Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: "daniel g. siegel" <dgsiegel gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: cheese for 2.22, realistic?
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:49:53 +0200
Le dimanche 23 septembre 2007, à 12:32 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> On So, 2007-09-23 at 12:16 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 17:42 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > >
> > > On Sa, 2007-09-22 at 17:13 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > > Le samedi 22 septembre 2007, à 16:38 +0200, daniel g. siegel a écrit :
> > > > > hey!
> > > > >
> > > > > im not shure at all, how to begin this mail.. and im even more unshure
> > > > > if i should propose cheese for 2.22 ;) my biggest concern is the
> > > > > development cycle, which is much faster than the gnome one atm (2 weeks
> > > > > to a month vs. 6 months). anyway, here is my proposal for including
> > > > > cheese in 2.22.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean about the development cycle. We have
> > > > lots of unstable release during those 6 months.
> > >
> > > could you tell me more about that?
> > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone
> i thought, you would point me to something else ;) the problem i see, is
> "unstable releases"...
> i mean: cheese has many new features at each release and this would be
> then "invisible" for the end user, as it is always an unstable release.
Then it works fine during the unstable cycle. You'll have to get used to
feature freeze and stable cycle, though.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and see http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing if you
> > > > want to have a complete proposal :-)
> > >
> > > isnt my proposal complete?
> > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing
> > Everything is in the wiki ;-)
> yeah, but what was missing? ;)
At least jhbuild integration and adding cheese to the list of proposed
modules on the wiki.
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
] [Thread Prev